Trump’s Defiant Run Risks Igniting Turmoil
Professor Habib Al-Badawi
As the United States barrels toward another pivotal presidential election cycle, the scars of its earlier brush with authoritarian populism have yet to fully heal. The traumatic denouement of Donald Trump’s norm-shattering presidency, culminating in the harrowing assault on the Capitol, served as a grave reminder of the fragility of democratic institutions once thought inviolable. In the aftermath, American society has remained gripped by a polarizing culture war stoked by disinformation and inflammatory rhetoric that has cast the nation’s very identity into existential uncertainty.
To observers steeped in America’s domestic political landscape, the resurgence of nostalgic yearnings for a long-departed era comes as no revelation. What shocks, however, is the disquieting trajectory—the transition from the traditionally restrained rivalry between parties, governed by norms and customs, toward overt confrontation. This unsettling metamorphosis took root with Trump’s incendiary arrival and further metastasized after his failure to secure re-election, stoking the embers of rage that now threaten to consume the nation’s political fabric in an unprecedented conflagration.
With Trump’s recent conviction on 34 criminal counts looming—especially should it culminate in the historic prospect of a former president incarcerated come July—the United States teeters perilously at the precipice of a state of obduracy and civic unrest hitherto unseen.
This dire scenario poses an existential peril for the very edifice of representative democracy itself, compounding the challenges it has confronted for at least a decade across the Western world. So grave is the crisis that esteemed political theorists have sounded a clarion call for cultivating a more vigorous “participatory democracy”—one that can rejuvenate democratic vitality by fostering a deeper reservoir of popular legitimacy through enhanced civic engagement and satisfaction.
The “Hush Money” Scandal: A Catalyzing Crucible
Trump’s criminal sentencing, even if it fails to derail his candidacy outright, threatens to irrevocably disrupt the once-orderly channels of political competition that bound even past presidents, however nominally, to respecting the Constitution and the rule of law. This veneer of civility was, at minimum, an expression of the peaceful transition of power—facilitated by the popular consent inherent in democracy’s agreed-upon premises and constitutional guardrails.
Yet this delicately woven democratic framework now risks unraveling entirely, as the Republican Party’s unequivocal endorsement of Trump as its standard-bearer—irrespective of the final verdict against him—portends his return to the political arena not through accepted norms but potentially through brute force and chaos. This combustible scenario seems even more probable should his fervent supporters, already primed by his cries of “witch hunt,” erupt in outrage at what they perceive as egregious injustice.
At the crux of Trump’s legal tribulations lies the “hush money” scandal, which saw him indicted for falsifying business records to conceal payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels—hush money to cloak their alleged sexual liaison. Prosecutors branded this scheme “an illegal conspiracy to undermine the integrity of the 2016 presidential election.” This damning charge alone delivers a body blow to Trump’s credibility and reputation, even as he prepares to appeal the July 11 sentencing date set by Judge Juan Merchan.
Constitutionally Permissible, But at What Cost?
Crucially, while Trump could theoretically wage his comeback campaign from behind bars, legal experts deem actual incarceration improbable given his advanced age, lack of prior criminal record, and the non-violent nature of the alleged misconduct. This grim prospect evokes eerie parallels to Eugene Debs, the Socialist Party candidate who remarkably garnered over a million votes while serving a draconian 10-year sentence in 1920, having been convicted of sedition for urging resistance to the military draft.
Indeed, the U.S. Constitution imposes no categorical prohibition on candidates with criminal records, mandating only that they be natural-born citizens over 40 years old. This sobering reality was not lost on Judge Merchan, who addressed Trump as “the former president of the United States and perhaps the next president as well”—a candid acknowledgment of the nation’s impending collision course that has loomed from the moment Trump’s indictment brazenly designated him a “candidate for the presidency.”
Even if ultimately spared imprisonment, the alarming prospect of Trump being confined to house arrest while campaigning, his movements monitored by armed agents, casts a pall over the electoral process—already besieged by his unrelenting assertions of judicial bias and politicization. The specter of the nation’s elite security apparatus surveilling a potentially home-bound candidate presents profound logistical and ethical dilemmas that could further erode faith in the system’s integrity and democratic credibility.
The Lingering “Trumpian” Specter
More distressing still is Trump’s catalytic role in giving irrevocable form to the “Trumpian” phenomenon—an insurrectionary brew of legal legitimacy, political indecency, far-right demagoguery, and a neo-McCarthyist undercurrent of rampant scapegoating. This pernicious ideology’s fixations on curbing immigration, projecting American populist nationalism, religious conservatism, and cultivating an “us vs. them” siege mentality against the “deep state” will inevitably infuse the Republican political discourse with a fervor bordering on zealotry long after the legal drama has concluded.
In turn, this presages a scorched-earth conflagration between the parties unprecedented in the modern era—a perpetual electioneering cycle mired in rancor that could persist well beyond 2024. Such a scenario would subject American democracy—ostensibly a model for global emulation—to an ordeal more severe than any stress test it has endured, with seismic ramifications reverberating across the world stage.
As the nation’s hallowed civic identity and credibility as a global democratic leader hang precariously in the balance, a dire imperative crystallizes: For the sake of preserving the integrity of their democratic experiment, Americans must summon the stalwart fortitude to defuse this smoldering powder keg through an uncompromising defense of pluralistic values. Failure to do so risks immolating the nation’s very soul in the all-consuming fires of hatred, division, and demagoguery.
A Reckoning for the Republican Party’s Soul
As the nation hurtles toward this fateful crossroads, the onus falls squarely on the Republican Party to reckon with the authoritarian forces it has welcomed into the fold. By embracing Trump’s “big lie” of a stolen election and rationalizing his norm-defying behavior, the GOP has not only enabled his autocratic impulses but also fanned the flames of resentment and anti-democratic fervor that now imperil the republic’s foundations.
Whether out of cynical political calculation or a sincerely misguided fealty to his personality cult, the party’s failure to decisively reject Trumpism has cleaved open dangerous fissures of paranoia, conspiracy theorism, and an “us vs. them” siege mentality within its base. This is the treacherous terrain from which demagogues derive their power—the promise of order through subjugation of the “other,” scapegoated as an existential enemy.
The preservation of democratic self-governance and ordered liberty demands moral courage from Republican leaders to unequivocally repudiate Trump’s authoritarian overtures and restore their party’s conservative principles to institutional norms and constitutional integrity. However, should they instead ride the tiger of Trumpism in a naked pursuit of power, the Republican Party may awaken to find it has sacrificed its democratic soul.
For a former president to demonize and dehumanize his perceived detractors—casting them as loathsome traitors and saboteurs working to undermine the nation from within—represents a shocking departure from the unifying rhetoric and democratic values that have historically bound a diverse nation so brazenly. Trump’s inflammatory invocations of purported “enemies within” seem calculated to cast his opposition not as loyal Americans but as a subversive cancer threatening the body politic itself. Such corrosive language strikes at the heart of civic pluralism and democratic discourse.
While fiery populist rhetoric is nothing new in American politics, there is a clear and dangerous distinction between rejecting unpopular policies and rejecting entire swaths of the population as enemies of the state based on creed or ideology. By blurring those lines so brazenly, Trump appears to be priming his base to reject any criticism or opposition as fundamentally unAmerican. And by leaving the definition of “enemy” amorphous, he creates an expansive blank canvas onto which millions can project their darkest fears and prejudices about racial, ethnic, religious, and ideological minorities.
From consolidating power to inciting stochastic violence, history has shown the profoundly destabilizing impacts that can arise when a xenophobic demagogue succeeds in cultivating an existential sense of siege among their followers. As such, it is incumbent on responsible leaders across the political spectrum to unequivocally condemn this alarming anti-democratic rhetoric and defend the bedrock pluralistic values that have allowed America’s unique experiment in republican democracy to endure. While robust political debate and dissent are virtues in a free society, dehumanizing entire segments of the population as insidious enemies is the hallmark of authoritarian regimes and an existential threat to the nation’s democratic identity and social cohesion.
This is the crossroads at which the American Republic finds itself today. One path leads to the retrenchment of constitutional order, democratic norms, and a renewal of government by and for pluralistic people. The other beckons deeper into the abyss of illiberalism and demagoguery, raising the specter of democratic backsliding into an eroded facsimile of mob rule. The ramifications of this pivotal inflection point extend far beyond domestic affairs, for a diminished and sclerotic American democracy would destabilize the global balance and fuel the spread of authoritarian movements worldwide.
The world bears witness to whether the American experiment can muster the resilience to resist its dark impulses and reaffirm its democratic first principles. For a great nation conceived in liberty to allow itself to be consumed by the very same flames of prejudice and persecution it once defeated on the global stage would be a tragedy of historic proportions. The arc of the civic American narrative remains unwritten; it falls to the citizens themselves to course-correct toward a revitalized participatory democracy—or bear the unbearable cost of its erosion.
Bibliography
Albert, V. (2016). The Limits to Citizen Power: Participatory Democracy and the Entanglements of the State (1st ed.). Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1cc2n44
New York Times. (2024, May 29). Read the jury instructions in the Trump Manhattan criminal trial. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/05/29/nyregion/judge-trump-hush-money-trial-jury-instructions.html
Karen Freifeld, Jody Godoy and Luc Cohen. (2023, April 5). Trump charged with hush-money scheme to boost 2016 election chances. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-faces-day-court-historic-us-first-2023-04-04/
Morgan, H. W. (1959). The Utopia of Eugene V. Debs. American Quarterly, 11(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/2710669
Cole, D. (2024, April 15). Who is Juan Merchan? What to know about the judge in Trump’s hush money case | CNN politics. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/15/politics/juan-merchan-judge-nyc/index.html
Kivisto, P. (2017). The Trump phenomenon: How the politics of populism won in 2016. Emerald Group Publishing.
Ahmad, A. (2023, March 23). What is neo-McCarthyism. The Michigan Daily. https://www.michigandaily.com/opinion/what-is-neo-mccarthyism-communist/
Ruge, M., & Shapiro, J. (2023, December 4). The Trumpist manifesto: The republican struggle for a second-term foreign policy. ECFR. https://ecfr.eu/article/the-trumpist-manifesto/
Campani, Giovanna & Concepción, Sunamis & Soler, Angel & Savín, Claudia. (2022). The Rise of Donald Trump Right-Wing Populism in the United States: Middle American Radicalism and Anti-Immigration Discourse. Societies. 12. 154. 10.3390/soc12060154
Alice Herman. (2024, February 23). Trump warns of enemies ‘within our country’ to Christian media gathering. the Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/23/trump-national-religious-broadcasters-enemies-within-country
