By Habib Al-Badawi
As the world navigates an era marked by intensifying geopolitical competition, Africa has emerged as a critical arena where global powers vie for influence. The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) 2024, held from 3 to 8 September, exemplifies China’s strategic engagement with the African continent, showcasing its expanding role as Africa’s largest trading partner and a principal source of investment. This growing influence, underscored by China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the recently launched Global Development Initiative, presents a complex challenge for European actors, particularly NATO members.
The European Union (EU) and its Member States, many of which are also NATO members, find themselves at a crossroads in their approach to Africa. The continent’s strategic importance to Europe is undisputed, yet the dynamics of EU-Africa relations are increasingly shaped by the presence of China, a partner, competitor, and systemic rival. The EU’s Global Gateway initiative, often seen as a counter to China’s BRI, underscores Europe’s intent to remain a significant player in Africa. However, the effectiveness of this strategy remains in question as European actors grapple with the need to offer competitive alternatives while addressing Africa’s priorities.
In this context, the European dilemma, and by extension, NATO’s strategic dilemma, centers on balancing the need for strategic autonomy with the realities of China’s entrenched presence in Africa. As European nations seek to reinforce their ties with African countries, they must navigate the delicate terrain of competition with China, all while fostering mutually beneficial partnerships with African states. The challenge lies not only in competing with China but also in aligning European and NATO offerings with the evolving needs and aspirations of African nations.
This paper sets the stage for a deeper exploration of the competitive dynamics between Europe, NATO, and China in Africa, examining the strategic implications for EU-Africa and NATO-Africa relations, and offering insights into potential pathways for Europe and the North Atlantic Alliance to assert their influence in this critical region.
The Shifting Geopolitical Landscape in Africa
The rise of China’s influence in Africa has been a defining feature of the continent’s geopolitical landscape in recent decades. As the world’s second-largest economy and a rapidly growing military power, China has made significant inroads in Africa, leveraging its economic and diplomatic heft to establish a robust presence across the region.
China’s engagement with Africa is multifaceted, encompassing trade, investment, infrastructure development, and political partnerships. Through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the more recently launched Global Development Initiative, China has provided substantial funding and expertise for projects ranging from railways and ports to digital infrastructure and natural resource extraction. This has often been accompanied by the deployment of Chinese state-owned enterprises and the provision of concessional loans, cementing China’s position as a crucial economic partner for many African nations.
Alongside this economic engagement, China has also sought to bolster its political and diplomatic influence in Africa. The biennial Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) has become a central platform for China to showcase its commitment to the continent, with the 2024 edition being the latest iteration of this high-profile event. Through FOCAC, China has pledged billions of dollars in investment, debt relief, and other forms of assistance, further solidifying its standing as a key player in African affairs.
The growing presence of China in Africa has not gone unnoticed by the traditional Western powers, particularly the European Union and its member states, many of whom are also NATO members. The EU has sought to counter China’s influence through initiatives like the Global Gateway, which aims to mobilize significant investment in infrastructure, digital, and green transitions across the African continent.
Similarly, NATO has recognized the strategic importance of Africa, with the alliance’s 2022 Strategic Concept highlighting the need to deepen engagement with African partners to address shared security challenges. However, the European and NATO responses to China’s ascendancy in Africa have been met with a degree of skepticism and resistance from African leaders.
Many African countries view their relationships with China as mutually beneficial, providing much-needed investment, development assistance, and political support without the perceived strings attached to Western aid and cooperation. This has created a complex geopolitical environment where Europe and NATO must navigate the delicate balance of competing with China while also addressing the priorities and concerns of their African counterparts.
The European Dilemma: Balancing Geopolitical Interests and African Priorities
The European Union’s approach to Africa has undergone a significant transformation in recent years, driven by the recognition of the continent’s growing strategic importance and the need to respond to the challenges posed by China’s expanding influence. This shift is evident in the EU’s various policy frameworks, such as the Global Gateway initiative and the revised European Consensus on Development, which emphasize the importance of deepening EU-Africa cooperation across a range of sectors.
At the heart of the European dilemma lies the need to balance its geopolitical interests with the evolving priorities and aspirations of African nations. On the one hand, the EU is acutely aware of the need to maintain its influence and strategic autonomy in a rapidly changing global landscape, particularly in the face of China’s ascendancy. The Global Gateway initiative, for example, is widely seen as the EU’s attempt to counter the BRI and assert its own vision for regional connectivity and infrastructure development.
On the other hand, the EU must navigate the delicate dynamics of its relationship with Africa, which has become increasingly assertive in shaping its own international engagements. Many African countries view their collaboration with China not as a zero-sum game but as an opportunity to diversify their partnerships and access much-needed investment and development assistance. The perception of Europe as a former colonial power, coupled with concerns about the conditionality often attached to Western aid, have led some African leaders to view China’s approach as more attractive and aligned with their own developmental goals.
This disconnects between European and African priorities has created a strategic dilemma for the EU. While the EU is keen to maintain its influence and relevance in Africa, it must do so in a way that addresses the specific needs and concerns of its African partners, rather than imposing a one-size-fits-all approach. The challenge lies in crafting a comprehensive strategy that can effectively compete with China’s offerings while also demonstrating a genuine commitment to African agency and self-determination.
One of the key elements of the European dilemma is the need to differentiate the EU’s value proposition from that of China. The Global Gateway initiative, while ambitious, has struggled to gain traction in Africa, as it is often perceived as a direct response to China’s BRI rather than a tailored solution to African development needs. European actors must find ways to showcase the unique strengths and advantages they can bring to the table, such as their expertise in sustainable development, good governance, and human rights.
Furthermore, the EU must be willing to make concessions and accommodate the priorities of African countries, even if they do not align perfectly with European interests. This may involve, for example, providing more favorable credit conditions, supporting debt relief initiatives, or enhancing African representation in global governance institutions. By demonstrating a genuine commitment to addressing African concerns, the EU can build trust and establish itself as a credible and reliable partner, rather than simply a competitor to China.
The NATO Dilemma: Aligning Security Interests with African Priorities
The strategic dilemma faced by the European Union in Africa is mirrored by the challenges confronting the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the region. As a security alliance with a growing focus on global engagement, NATO has recognized the importance of strengthening its ties with African partners to address shared threats and promote regional stability. However, NATO’s approach to Africa has often been viewed with skepticism by some African leaders, who are wary of perceived Western interventionism and the potential for the alliance to become embroiled in local conflicts.
The legacy of colonial-era military interventions and the more recent involvement of NATO forces in Libya have left an impression on many African nations, who are cautious about the alliance’s intentions and the potential for its activities to exacerbate regional tensions.
Moreover, the security priorities of NATO and many African countries do not always align seamlessly. While NATO is primarily concerned with addressing threats such as terrorism, organized crime, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, African nations often place greater emphasis on issues like economic development, climate change, and human security. This disconnect can make it challenging for NATO to effectively engage with its African partners and demonstrate the relevance of its security capabilities to the continent’s most pressing concerns.
Despite these challenges, NATO has sought to deepen its engagement with Africa in recent years, recognizing the strategic importance of the continent in the global security landscape. The alliance’s 2022 Strategic Concept, for instance, highlighted the need to strengthen partnerships with African organizations like the African Union and to collaborate on issues such as maritime security, counter terrorism, and crisis management. However, the success of NATO’s efforts in Africa will hinge on its ability to strike a delicate balance between its own security interests and the priorities of African nations.
This may involve a more nuanced and flexible approach, one that emphasizes collaboration, capacity-building, and the provision of tailored security assistance rather than a heavy-handed military presence. Moreover, NATO must be willing to collaborate with other international actors, including the European Union and China, to address shared security challenges in Africa. This will require a more coordinated and coherent approach to the continent, one that avoids the perception of zero-sum competition and instead focuses on finding areas of complementarity and mutual benefit.
Pathways Forward: Navigating the Complexity of EU-Africa and NATO-Africa Relations
As Europe and NATO grapple with the strategic dilemma posed by China’s growing influence in Africa, several pathways emerge that could help navigate the complexity of their respective relationships with the continent.
- Align Offerings with African Priorities: Building on the recognition of African agency, Europe and NATO must ensure that their various initiatives and programs are closely aligned with the developmental goals and policy frameworks of their African counterparts. This may involve a more granular, sector-specific approach that addresses issues such as sustainable infrastructure, climate change, food security, and regional integration—all of which are high on the agenda for many African nations.
- Demonstrate Flexibility and Responsiveness: In an environment characterized by rapidly evolving priorities and shifting power dynamics, Europe and NATO must demonstrate a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness. This may involve being willing to adjust their strategies and offerings based on feedback from African partners, as well as showcasing a genuine commitment to addressing the continent’s most pressing concerns, even if they do not align perfectly with European or NATO interests.
- Enhance Coordination and Cooperation: Given the complex geopolitical landscape, it is crucial for Europe and NATO to enhance coordination and cooperation, both internally and with other key actors in Africa. This may include strengthening collaboration between the EU and NATO, as well as exploring avenues for joint initiatives or burden-sharing with China and other emerging powers. By presenting a united front and finding areas of complementarity, European and NATO actors can maximize their impact and influence in the region.
- Invest in Long-Term, Resilient Partnerships: Rather than pursuing short-term, transactional relationships, Europe and NATO should focus on building long-term, resilient partnerships with African nations. This may involve investing in capacity-building, knowledge-sharing, and joint problem-solving, as well as exploring innovative financing mechanisms and risk-sharing models that can help to foster more sustainable and mutually beneficial collaboration.
- Leverage unique strengths and capabilities: While it may be challenging to compete directly with China’s scale of investment and speed of execution, Europe and NATO can leverage their unique strengths and capabilities to differentiate their offerings. This may include emphasizing their expertise in governance, transparency, and sustainable development, as well as their ability to mobilize private sector investment and support regional integration efforts.
- Prioritize African Agency and Ownership: The first and perhaps most crucial step is for European and NATO actors to recognize the agency and decision-making power of African states. Rather than imposing their own priorities and vision, they must engage in genuine, two-way dialogue to understand the specific needs and aspirations of their African partners. This will require a fundamental shift in mindset, moving away from a paternalistic approach to one that respects African leadership and self-determination.
By embracing these pathways, Europe and NATO can navigate the complex geopolitical landscape in Africa and assert their influence in a manner that is better aligned with the priorities and aspirations of their African partners. This will not only help to mitigate the strategic dilemma posed by China’s ascendancy but also contribute to the advancement of a more equitable, stable, and prosperous African continent.
Concluding Remarks
The strategic dilemma faced by NATO and its European member states in Africa, amid China’s growing influence, is a multifaceted challenge that requires a nuanced and adaptable approach. As the world’s second-largest economy and a rapidly expanding military power, China has made significant inroads in Africa, leveraging its economic and diplomatic heft to establish a robust presence across the region.
The European Union and NATO have recognized the need to counter China’s influence and maintain their own strategic interests in Africa. However, this has led to a complex geopolitical environment where European and NATO actors must balance their geostrategic ambitions with the evolving priorities and concerns of their African counterparts.
The European dilemma, in particular, centers on the need to differentiate the EU’s value proposition from that of China while also demonstrating a genuine commitment to addressing African development needs and aspirations. This will require a fundamental shift in mindset, moving away from a paternalistic approach to one that respects African agency and self-determination.
Similarly, NATO’s strategic dilemma in Africa revolves around the need to align its security interests with the priorities of African nations, which often place greater emphasis on issues like economic development, climate change, and human security. Navigating this complex landscape will require NATO to adopt a more nuanced and flexible approach, one that emphasizes collaboration, capacity-building, and the provision of tailored security assistance.
By embracing pathways that prioritize African agency, align offerings with African priorities, enhance coordination and cooperation, leverage unique strengths and capabilities, demonstrate flexibility and responsiveness, and invest in long-term, resilient partnerships, Europe and NATO can chart a course that not only mitigates the strategic dilemma posed by China’s ascendancy but also contributes to the advancement of a more equitable, stable, and prosperous African continent.
Ultimately, the success of Europe and NATO’s engagement in Africa will hinge on their ability to adapt to the evolving geopolitical realities while remaining steadfast in their commitment to fostering mutually beneficial and sustainable partnerships with their African counterparts.
References
Chen, M. (2024). The latecomer’s rise: Policy banks and the globalization of China’s development finance. Cornell University Press.
Eisenman, J., & Heginbotham, E. (2023). China’s relations with the global south. In K. Kironska & R. Q. Turscanyi (Eds.), Contemporary China: A new superpower? Routledge.
Jopson, B., & Anderlini, J. (2009, November 9). China pledges $10 billion in low-cost loans to Africa. The Washington Post.
Meng, W. (2024). Developmental peace: Theorizing China’s approach to international peacebuilding. Ibidem. Columbia University Press.
Murphy, D. C. (2022). China’s rise in the global south: The Middle East, Africa, and Beijing’s alternative world order. Stanford University Press.
Shinn, D. H., & Eisenman, J. (2023). China’s relations with Africa: A new era of strategic engagement. Columbia University Press.
United Nations News Service. (2009, November 9). UN News – Head of UN agency applauds China-Africa forum’s commitment on food security. UN News Service Section.
